The Lost Worlds of John Ford: Beyond the Western
Jeffrey Richards
Bloomsbury, pp.334, $115
“My name is John Ford,” said the director of She Wore a Yellow Ribbon, Fort Apache, and The Searchers. “And I make Westerns.” But there are Westerns, and then there are Westerns.
From the dawn of the film medium
through at least the early 1970s, Hollywood regularly churned out routine,
undistinguished Westerns: clichéd shoot-’em-ups featuring gunslingers with wax
mustaches. Yet Ford—like the most talented of his colleagues, including Budd
Boetticher, Howard Hawks, and Anthony Mann—was never interested in horse operas
in se.
While the Westerns made by these men,
among the most gifted artists of Hollywood’s Golden Age, featured the same
saloons, stagecoaches, and cavalry outposts as those of their less talented
brethren, for most of them, the genre’s trappings provided a convenient,
commercially viable template to explore the themes that exercised them—in
Ford’s case, questions of courage and code and honor and masculinity. So, when
he said his name was John Ford and he made Westerns, he was speaking not with
self-effacement but with a kind of rascally pride: just look at what I did with
such a woebegone genre!
Indeed, as critics have long
understood, Ford, who was born Sean Aloysius O’Feeney in Maine in 1894 and died
in California in 1973, didn’t make Westerns. He used them. “A Ford film,
particularly a late Ford film, is more than its story and characterization; it
is also the director’s attitude toward his milieu and its codes of conduct,”
wrote Andrew Sarris in his classic study of Hollywood filmmakers, The American
Cinema: Directors and Directions, 1929-1968. As an example, Sarris highlighted one of the
most expressive scenes in The Searchers—a seemingly incidental, almost
tossed-off moment in which Martha (Dorothy Jordan) is glimpsed through a
passageway as she cradles, then pats the army uniform of her brother-in-law,
Ethan Edwards (John Wayne).
For Sarris, the most significant thing
about Martha’s fond handling of Ethan’s garment is how it is framed. In the
film, Martha is seen from the point of view of a visitor to her home, “Captain
the Reverend” Samuel Johnston Clayton (Ward Bond)—here, the very picture of
gallantry. “Nothing on earth would ever force this man to reveal what he had
seen,” Sarris wrote. “There is a deep, subtle chivalry at work here, and in
most of Ford’s films, but it is never obtrusive enough to interfere with the
flow of the narrative.”
One sometimes has the sense that Ford
went to great pains and expended great sums simply to give himself the
opportunity to film such tiny, transient bits amid his action-packed Western
adventures: we can picture the great director summoning assorted horses,
extras, and movie technicians to his favorite locale (Monument Valley, Utah)
ostensibly to film a battle but with the ulterior motive of capturing a dance
or a march or, indeed, a private moment glimpsed, out of the corners of his eyes,
by Ward Bond.
Though today less well-known than The
Searchers, Fort Apache—on the surface a portrait of two cavalry officers of opposite
philosophies, the intuitive Captain Kirby York (Wayne) and the intractable
Lieutenant Colonel Owen Thursday (Henry Fonda)—offers similar observational
digressions. Think of the mock-formal way that Colonel Thursday’s grown
daughter Philadelphia (Shirley Temple) greets a junior officer whom she has
already informally met but is introduced to for a second time—curtsying and
saying, “How do you do?”—or the comically stiff way the colonel, a man with a
scant sense of fun, dances with a sergeant’s wife. Yes, there are great battles
in Fort Apache, but the
scenes that stand out are those that reflect Ford’s utter delight in people,
regardless of their background or station.
It is fitting that a recent book on
Ford seeks to untether Ford from the Western genre with which he long ago
became synonymous. “He received four best director Oscars but none of them for
a Western,” writes Jeffrey Richards in The Lost Worlds of John
Ford: Beyond the Western, “In fact he made no Westerns between 1929 and 1939. When he was honored
in 1972 by a Screen Directors Guild ‘Salute,’ the film he chose to accompany
the ceremony was his Welsh family saga How Green Was My Valley and not one of his celebrated
Westerns.”
Richards, an emeritus professor at
Lancaster University in England, does the useful work of reminding readers of
the many kinds of films Ford actually directed—from a World War II drama (They Were
Expendable) to a full-bodied
romance (The Quiet Man) to a bawdy, outrageous comedy (Donovan’s Reef)—but he also makes the larger point
that, for Ford, genres, Western or otherwise, were vessels for themes,
character types, rituals, and stray little human moments like Martha’s embrace
of the jacket—what Richards would call “bits of business,” such as the line “A
slug of gin, please,” which appears in the mouths of female characters in three
films.
Richards has an impressive command of
Ford’s body of work, enumerating the “funerals, burials, wakes formal and
informal” in some seventeen films, adding “executions, formally conducted” in a
further four. He describes several of the most durable members of Ford’s famous
stock companies of actors, including his own brother, Francis, who was cast as
a “lovable drunken wreck” in some thirty-one films. Mae Marsh, long ago a star
for D.W. Griffith, turned up in seventeen films, and Danny Borzage, the sibling
of the great director Frank Borzage, in sixteen: “These old friends grow old
together in his films and their presence gives an added warmth, a sense of
continuity and of time passing and reflects that family feeling which Ford sees
as the cement to society.”
Richards doesn’t divide Ford’s work
into totally discrete genres—the comedies here, the thrillers there—but prefers
looser categorizations, focusing on the director’s career-long interest in
celebrating Ireland (from whence his family came) and venerating the Catholic
Church (of which he was an adherent), as well as his prevailing preoccupations
with the reach of empires, the underworld, and war generally and the United
States Navy (of which he was a veteran) specifically:
His films consistently articulate and embody his deep love of Ireland, his profound Catholic faith, the importance of family and community, his reverence for the military, the nature of male friendship, the values of service, sacrifice, loyalty, comradeship, and sympathy for outsiders, exiles, misfits and outcasts.
If this litany of passions, beliefs, and convictions
attributed to Ford sounds rather breathless, perhaps it is because the
director’s life, like his films, was something of a glorious muddle. “For
someone who celebrated the family in his films, he was an unsatisfactory
husband and father,” Richards writes, adding that Ford was politically
ambivalent as well. Richards says that Ford once identified himself as “a
definite Socialistic democrat”—after all, among his most cherished non-Western
films is his adaptation of The Grapes of Wrath—yet notes that he counted himself as a
supporter of the wars in Korea and Vietnam.
The most charitable gloss on such
contradictions is not to deny them or even somehow attempt to reconcile them
but to see them as part of Ford’s all-inclusive vision of humanity. “Jack was a
man for all seasons, but not a man for all actors,” wrote Harry Carey, Jr., a
significant supporting player in many Ford productions and the son of an actor
who was himself a key player in many other Ford productions. “He was kind to
the tough and cruel to the fainthearted, paternal and gentle to the girls. They
loved him, but he was
afraid of them.”
Richards sees Ford in much the same
way: as a sort of sloppy giant who, according to the actor Frank Baker, was so
courteous to women that he forbade the use of profanity in their presence on
his sets but so desired rowdy male fellowship that he spruced up a one
hundred-ten-foot ketch called the Araner to use on occasion for work purposes,
such as script conferences, but more often for gambling and drinking with
members of the so-called Young Men’s Purity, Total Abstinence and Yacht
Association.
One could credibly call Ford fickle, an
argument evidenced by the alternating periods of closeness and estrangement
from even his most cherished friends and collaborators, including Wayne and
Fonda. Peter Bogdanovich, a devoted acolyte before becoming a filmmaker
himself, once told me that Ford single-handedly discouraged Wayne from
appearing in Bogdanovich’s planned epic Western, Streets of Laredo (which later morphed into Larry
McMurtry’s novel Lonesome Dove). “Ford was malicious,” Bogdanovich said of
his mentor. “Ford was also very nice.”
Perhaps it’s fairer to say that Ford
had an artist’s capacity to see all sides of an argument, even those arguments
he had with himself. And several of the key films discussed here reflect, even
more fully than his Westerns, Ford’s attempt to capture the entire human parade
on screen. For example, the Hawaiian-set romp Donovan’s Reef is framed as a battle of wills between
the uncultivated barkeeper Donovan (Wayne) and the demure Bostonian Amelia
Dedham (Elizabeth Allen), but while Ford may have intended the showdown, as
Richards writes, to be a variant on The Taming of the Shrew, the filmmaker never tips his hand
about whose side he’s really on: when, upon her arrival, Donovan beckons Amelia
from her boat into his canoe—a disembarkation sure to end in disaster—Amelia
ends up pulling both of them into the water. With her neat white suit and fine
white hat drenched, Ford seems to be having a joke at Amelia’s expense, but
when she reams Donovan out, it’s hard to disagree with her judgement: “Of all
the stupid, imbecilic oafs!” As a gentleman and a grouch, Ford could probably
identify with both.
Drawing intelligently on pioneering
Ford scholarship by Bogdanovich, Tag Gallagher, and Joseph McBride, among others, Richards is attuned to seemingly
arcane shifts in critical perceptions, noting that several of the director’s
most openly artistic films—including The Informer and the brilliant Eugene
O’Neill-derived Long Voyage Home—were unjustly ignored in favor of his more
modest, unfussy Westerns. In the process, Richards brings our attention
to strands in Ford’s work that are too seldom discussed, especially his piety.
In a famous scene in The Searchers, Ethan has little patience for a
hastily assembled funeral service for his murdered kinfolk. More compelled to
avenge than to mourn, Ethan storms off before the singing of “Shall We Gather
at the River?” is complete, shouting, “There’s no more time for prayin’! Amen!”
Yet numerous other Ford films, particularly his non-Westerns, reflect the
director’s own faith, which is described unambiguously by Richards: “As a
practicing Catholic who went to mass [sic] regularly, and died clutching his
rosary beads, he saw religion as the cement of society and Catholicism as the
best of all available faiths.”
Unusually attuned to denominational
distinctions for a writer on a subject as earthbound and temporal as cinema,
Richards allows that Ford evinced respect for religiosity in general—for
example, the Mormon community portrayed in Wagon Master—but concedes that for Ford, “when it
comes to a choice of faiths, it is Catholicism every time.” Richards is
especially persuasive in making a case for Ford’s masterly allegorical drama The Fugitive, drawn from Graham Greene’s novel The Power
and the Glory, against
those critics who devalued it for its solemnity and air of self-importance.
Another (now) little-seen Ford film, Mary of Scotland with Katharine Hepburn as Mary, Queen
of Scots, is also imbued with the director’s faith: “Mary’s death and the last
scene of the film remain one of the most stunning and emotional things Ford
ever did. The last morning of her life dawns to find Mary asleep on her knees
before her crucifix.”
At the same time, Richards gives time
and attention to films that never caught on even in their own day, such as Gideon’s
Day—a vibrant drama
that makes a Scotland Yard inspector’s domestic life, including his effort to
fulfill his family’s grocery order, seem as hectic, congested, and finally
rewarding as his work life—and Ford’s final feature, 7 Women. Richards does not neglect assorted
Fordian ephemera, including Young Cassidy—a film starring Rod Taylor as a
fictionalized version of Sean O’Casey from which Ford, drinking and ill,
departed mid-production—and his last directorial undertaking of any sort: Chesty, a short but majestic documentary on
the life of Lieutenant General Lewis “Chesty” Puller.
Any book that examines so many of
Ford’s films in such detail while purposely excluding those for which he is
best known today should lead us to ask why non-film buffs should care. The
answer, I think, is that when viewed in toto, Ford’s work, within the Western
genre and otherwise, has a profoundly ennobling quality. This is not to deny
the limitations of the films—racist attitudes mar far too many—but to recognize
that, on balance, they present a world in harmony: the strong, the sentimental,
the paternal, the maternal, the weak, the stuffy—they all have places in the
tapestry.
At the close of The Quiet
Man, Ford calls back
the cast for a reprise, with the inhabitants of the village looking in the
direction of the camera: a pair of clergymen smile. An old lady curtsies. An
old man shakes a stick. Finally—magically—the hero and heroine, played by Wayne
and Maureen O’Hara, wave gregariously as they stand together on a path of rocks
bridging a stream. She whispers to him; he whips around his head in surprise.
Then a series of lovely little actions: O’Hara grabs hold of the stick Wayne is
holding, hurls it into the stream like a Pro Bowl quarterback, and gives him a
hearty pat on the forearm. She scampers off; he follows her. Watching this, one
would be forgiven for wondering whether any visual artist, ever, more
beautifully encapsulated the verse in Genesis: “Male and female created He
them.”
Viewers should be forgiven, too, for
wondering whether society might be healthier if more men were like John Wayne,
more women like Maureen O’Hara, and the rest of us could see the world as John
Ford did.
Peter Tonguette writes for many publications, including the
Wall Street
Journal, the Washington Examiner, and National Review.